SINE retrotransposons cause epigenetic reprogramming of adjacent gene promoters

MRH Estécio, J Gallegos, M Dekmezian, Y Lu… - Molecular Cancer …, 2012 - AACR
MRH Estécio, J Gallegos, M Dekmezian, Y Lu, S Liang, JPJ Issa
Molecular Cancer Research, 2012AACR
Almost half of the human genome and as much as 40% of the mouse genome is composed
of repetitive DNA sequences. The majority of these repeats are retrotransposons of the SINE
and LINE families, and such repeats are generally repressed by epigenetic mechanisms. It
has been proposed that these elements can act as methylation centers from which DNA
methylation spreads into gene promoters in cancer. Contradictory to a methylation center
function, we have found that retrotransposons are enriched near promoter CpG islands that …
Abstract
Almost half of the human genome and as much as 40% of the mouse genome is composed of repetitive DNA sequences. The majority of these repeats are retrotransposons of the SINE and LINE families, and such repeats are generally repressed by epigenetic mechanisms. It has been proposed that these elements can act as methylation centers from which DNA methylation spreads into gene promoters in cancer. Contradictory to a methylation center function, we have found that retrotransposons are enriched near promoter CpG islands that stay methylation-free in cancer. Clearly, it is important to determine which influence, if any, these repetitive elements have on nearby gene promoters. Using an in vitro system, we confirm here that SINE B1 elements can influence the activity of downstream gene promoters, with acquisition of DNA methylation and loss of activating histone marks, thus resulting in a repressed state. SINE sequences themselves did not immediately acquire DNA methylation but were marked by H3K9me2 and H3K27me3. Moreover, our bisulfite sequencing data did not support that gain of DNA methylation in gene promoters occurred by methylation spreading from SINE B1 repeats. Genome-wide analysis of SINE repeats distribution showed that their enrichment is directly correlated with the presence of USF1, USF2, and CTCF binding, proteins with insulator function. In summary, our work supports the concept that SINE repeats interfere negatively with gene expression and that their presence near gene promoters is counter-selected, except when the promoter is protected by an insulator element. Mol Cancer Res; 10(10); 1332–42. ©2012 AACR.
AACR