Anterior inferotemporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position

JJ DiCarlo, JHR Maunsell - Journal of neurophysiology, 2003 - journals.physiology.org
Journal of neurophysiology, 2003journals.physiology.org
Visual object recognition is computationally difficult because changes in an object's position,
distance, pose, or setting may cause it to produce a different retinal image on each
encounter. To robustly recognize objects, the primate brain must have mechanisms to
compensate for these variations. Although these mechanisms are poorly understood, it is
thought that they elaborate neuronal representations in the inferotemporal cortex that are
sensitive to object form but substantially invariant to other image variations. This study …
Visual object recognition is computationally difficult because changes in an object's position, distance, pose, or setting may cause it to produce a different retinal image on each encounter. To robustly recognize objects, the primate brain must have mechanisms to compensate for these variations. Although these mechanisms are poorly understood, it is thought that they elaborate neuronal representations in the inferotemporal cortex that are sensitive to object form but substantially invariant to other image variations. This study examines this hypothesis for image variation resulting from changes in object position. We studied the effect of small differences (±1.5°) in the retinal position of small (0.6° wide) visual forms on both the behavior of monkeys trained to identify those forms and the responses of 146 anterior IT (AIT) neurons collected during that behavior. Behavioral accuracy and speed were largely unaffected by these small changes in position. Consistent with previous studies, many AIT responses were highly selective for the forms. However, AIT responses showed far greater sensitivity to retinal position than predicted from their reported receptive field (RF) sizes. The median AIT neuron showed a ∼60% response decrease between positions within ±1.5° of the center of gaze, and 52% of neurons were unresponsive to one or more of these positions. Consistent with previous studies, each neuron's rank order of target preferences was largely unaffected across position changes. Although we have not yet determined the conditions necessary to observe this marked position sensitivity in AIT responses, we rule out effects of spatial-frequency content, eye movements, and failures to include the RF center. To reconcile this observation with previous studies, we hypothesize that either AIT position sensitivity strongly depends on object size or that position sensitivity is sharpened by extensive visual experience at fixed retinal positions or by the presence of flanking distractors.
American Physiological Society