[PDF][PDF] How sib pairs reveal linkage

E Drigalenko - The American Journal of Human Genetics, 1998 - cell.com
E Drigalenko
The American Journal of Human Genetics, 1998cell.com
The Haseman-Elston (1972) method, widely used for studying linkage, has been criticized
for incomplete utilization of sib-pair information. As an alternative, Amos (1994) created and
advocates the “variancecomponents” approach; Wright (1997), using a “likelihood
argument,” found that the phenotypic difference discards sib-pair linkage information; and
Fulker and Cherny (1996) came to a similar conclusion after an analysis of sib-pair
covariances (Fulker et al. 1995). Here, I propose an extension of the Haseman-Elston (1972) …
The Haseman-Elston (1972) method, widely used for studying linkage, has been criticized for incomplete utilization of sib-pair information. As an alternative, Amos (1994) created and advocates the “variancecomponents” approach; Wright (1997), using a “likelihood argument,” found that the phenotypic difference discards sib-pair linkage information; and Fulker and Cherny (1996) came to a similar conclusion after an analysis of sib-pair covariances (Fulker et al. 1995). Here, I propose an extension of the Haseman-Elston (1972) method that puts the sib-trait sum into linkage testing.
Suppose a trait X has a normal distribution with a mean genetically determined and environmental (residual) variance; each sib pair has i alleles identical by 2 je descent (IBD) at the trait locus,, 1, or 2; and the i 0 sib pair–trait vector has joint normal (bi-T T X {(X, X)
cell.com